<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 295 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334277</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to quash the reassessment proceedings for Assessment Years 2002-03 and 2004-05. The Court found that the reopening notices by the Assessing Officer were based on a change of opinion rather than a valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment, in line with the precedent set in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kelvinator of India. As a result, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling that there was no substantial question of law and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 295 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334277</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to quash the reassessment proceedings for Assessment Years 2002-03 and 2004-05. The Court found that the reopening notices by the Assessing Officer were based on a change of opinion rather than a valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment, in line with the precedent set in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kelvinator of India. As a result, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling that there was no substantial question of law and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>