<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 291 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the disallowed claim of indexed cost of improvement in the computation of capital gains. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the claim and the inconsistency between the valuation report and the claimed expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 291 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the disallowed claim of indexed cost of improvement in the computation of capital gains. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the claim and the inconsistency between the valuation report and the claimed expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>