<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 276 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334258</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order confirming the recovery of CENVAT Credit on input services like Health Insurance and Air Travel Services was set aside. The Member (Judicial) relied on previous Tribunal cases and determined that the input services in question fell within the definition of input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The decision emphasized the importance of precedent in establishing the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on specific input services, ultimately granting relief to the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:35:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 276 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334258</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order confirming the recovery of CENVAT Credit on input services like Health Insurance and Air Travel Services was set aside. The Member (Judicial) relied on previous Tribunal cases and determined that the input services in question fell within the definition of input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The decision emphasized the importance of precedent in establishing the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on specific input services, ultimately granting relief to the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>