<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 273 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334255</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the impugned order that set aside the proceedings initiated by the show cause notice dated 30/4/2002 regarding the excisability of furniture assembled at customer sites. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent based on a previous case precedent upheld by the High Court of Delhi, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the decision to drop the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 273 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334255</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the impugned order that set aside the proceedings initiated by the show cause notice dated 30/4/2002 regarding the excisability of furniture assembled at customer sites. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent based on a previous case precedent upheld by the High Court of Delhi, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the decision to drop the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>