https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334251 The appeal concerned duty reversal on broken glass bottles during aerated bottle filling, with the respondent availing cenvat credit. The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's decision in favor of the respondent, citing previous rulings in similar cases. The issue of duty liability on scrap generated during manufacturing was also addressed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the respondent based on past decisions. As the Tribunal found the impugned order legally sound and consistent with prior judgments, the appeal was rejected. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:35:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334251 The appeal concerned duty reversal on broken glass bottles during aerated bottle filling, with the respondent availing cenvat credit. The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's decision in favor of the respondent, citing previous rulings in similar cases. The issue of duty liability on scrap generated during manufacturing was also addressed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the respondent based on past decisions. As the Tribunal found the impugned order legally sound and consistent with prior judgments, the appeal was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334251