<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 264 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the classification of goods imported by M/s Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd under heading 9032.89 of the Customs Tariff Act, based on the specific functions of the equipment for dispensing and controlling processes in the textile industry. The decision emphasized the exclusion of measuring instruments from the residuary category under heading 84.79, in line with Rule 3(c) of the General Rules for Interpretation of the Import Tariff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=447028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 264 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the classification of goods imported by M/s Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd under heading 9032.89 of the Customs Tariff Act, based on the specific functions of the equipment for dispensing and controlling processes in the textile industry. The decision emphasized the exclusion of measuring instruments from the residuary category under heading 84.79, in line with Rule 3(c) of the General Rules for Interpretation of the Import Tariff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>