https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334243 The appeal was filed against the rejection of a refund claim due to the non-submission of the original TR 6 challan. The appellant offered to provide an indemnity bond in place of the lost challan, but the department rejected this offer citing lack of evidence. The case was remanded for the appellant to execute the indemnity bond and reprocess the refund claim. The Member (Judicial) emphasized that if the appellant provides the bond, the refund could be sanctioned. The matter was directed to the original adjudicating authority for reprocessing within three months, concluding the appeal through remand. en-us Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:12:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334243 The appeal was filed against the rejection of a refund claim due to the non-submission of the original TR 6 challan. The appellant offered to provide an indemnity bond in place of the lost challan, but the department rejected this offer citing lack of evidence. The case was remanded for the appellant to execute the indemnity bond and reprocess the refund claim. The Member (Judicial) emphasized that if the appellant provides the bond, the refund could be sanctioned. The matter was directed to the original adjudicating authority for reprocessing within three months, concluding the appeal through remand. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334243