https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187809 Order 2 Rule 2 CPC bars a later suit only when it is founded on the same cause of action as the earlier suit and the omitted relief arose from that same factual basis. Mere identity of parties or property is not enough. Here, the earlier injunction suit rested on alleged threat of dispossession, while the later specific performance suit arose from the agreement to sell and the subsequent refusal to perform after disclosure of the housing board transfer. Because the two suits depended on different facts and evidentiary foundations, and no intentional relinquishment was shown, the subsequent suit was not barred. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:04:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187809 Order 2 Rule 2 CPC bars a later suit only when it is founded on the same cause of action as the earlier suit and the omitted relief arose from that same factual basis. Mere identity of parties or property is not enough. Here, the earlier injunction suit rested on alleged threat of dispossession, while the later specific performance suit arose from the agreement to sell and the subsequent refusal to perform after disclosure of the housing board transfer. Because the two suits depended on different facts and evidentiary foundations, and no intentional relinquishment was shown, the subsequent suit was not barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187809