<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 249 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334231</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the assessee&#039;s claim that interest expenses were allowable as business expenditure and that income from operating malls should be treated as business income. The Tribunal referred to legal principles and precedents to support its decision, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 16:57:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 249 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334231</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the assessee&#039;s claim that interest expenses were allowable as business expenditure and that income from operating malls should be treated as business income. The Tribunal referred to legal principles and precedents to support its decision, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>