<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 533 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187803</link>
    <description>Interest was directed on sales tax refund money retained by the revenue without justification, because the amount had been paid under protest on stone-crushing activity later treated as non-manufacturing activity. Although the statutory interest provision under section 54(1)(aa) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 applied from 1 April 1993, the pre-1993-94 period was covered by the compensatory principle that an assessee should receive interest when the State retains money unlawfully. Simple interest at 9% per annum was therefore payable for the earlier assessment period, with a higher rate applying if payment was delayed beyond the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:56:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 533 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187803</link>
      <description>Interest was directed on sales tax refund money retained by the revenue without justification, because the amount had been paid under protest on stone-crushing activity later treated as non-manufacturing activity. Although the statutory interest provision under section 54(1)(aa) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 applied from 1 April 1993, the pre-1993-94 period was covered by the compensatory principle that an assessee should receive interest when the State retains money unlawfully. Simple interest at 9% per annum was therefore payable for the earlier assessment period, with a higher rate applying if payment was delayed beyond the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>