<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (1) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187802</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed the impugned order dated August 25, 1955, finding it arbitrary and contrary to the Indian Police Service (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1954. The Court directed the Central Government to determine the appellant&#039;s year of allotment and seniority in consultation with the Commission, emphasizing the irrationality of selecting May 19, 1951, as a crucial date for seniority purposes. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the respondent was ordered to cover the appellant&#039;s costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (1) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187802</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed the impugned order dated August 25, 1955, finding it arbitrary and contrary to the Indian Police Service (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1954. The Court directed the Central Government to determine the appellant&#039;s year of allotment and seniority in consultation with the Commission, emphasizing the irrationality of selecting May 19, 1951, as a crucial date for seniority purposes. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the respondent was ordered to cover the appellant&#039;s costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>