<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 242 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that the appellant correctly utilized CENVAT credit to discharge service tax liability on &quot;Goods Transport Agency&quot; services during the relevant period. The decision emphasized the importance of interpreting legal provisions accurately and maintaining consistency in decisions based on precedents and established principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 242 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that the appellant correctly utilized CENVAT credit to discharge service tax liability on &quot;Goods Transport Agency&quot; services during the relevant period. The decision emphasized the importance of interpreting legal provisions accurately and maintaining consistency in decisions based on precedents and established principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>