<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 240 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334222</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, with the impugned order being set aside. It was determined that the appellant could utilize CENVAT credit for discharging service tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism for design development services of fabrics received from a foreign entity. This decision aligned with a previous ruling by the same Bench, confirming the permissibility of using CENVAT credit in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:41:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 240 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334222</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, with the impugned order being set aside. It was determined that the appellant could utilize CENVAT credit for discharging service tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism for design development services of fabrics received from a foreign entity. This decision aligned with a previous ruling by the same Bench, confirming the permissibility of using CENVAT credit in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>