<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SSI Exemption: Brand Name Ownership Must Be Unique for Separate Entities to Qualify for Exemption Benefits.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32001</link>
    <description>SSI exemption - use of brand name - The brand name apparently cannot belong to two different entities if the appellants arguments of HP and HPC are two different legal entities for SSI exemption then use of common brand bane will deprive atleast one of them from SSI exemption - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:15:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:15:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SSI Exemption: Brand Name Ownership Must Be Unique for Separate Entities to Qualify for Exemption Benefits.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32001</link>
      <description>SSI exemption - use of brand name - The brand name apparently cannot belong to two different entities if the appellants arguments of HP and HPC are two different legal entities for SSI exemption then use of common brand bane will deprive atleast one of them from SSI exemption - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:15:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>