<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1076 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187795</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding decisions regarding Land Survey expenditure and the difference in land valuation, emphasizing the application of section 50C in determining the full value of consideration in such cases. The disallowance of PF contribution under section 36(1)(va) was not further considered due to a small tax implication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1076 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187795</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding decisions regarding Land Survey expenditure and the difference in land valuation, emphasizing the application of section 50C in determining the full value of consideration in such cases. The disallowance of PF contribution under section 36(1)(va) was not further considered due to a small tax implication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>