https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187793 The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 5(1)(e) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The appellant was found guilty of possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income, with unexplained assets amounting to Rs. 3,05,985.39. The Court rejected the appellant's claims regarding loans, valuation of assets, and the inclusion of Travelling Allowance and Bonus as income. The High Court's recalculations were deemed within its jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:17:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187793 The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 5(1)(e) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The appellant was found guilty of possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income, with unexplained assets amounting to Rs. 3,05,985.39. The Court rejected the appellant's claims regarding loans, valuation of assets, and the inclusion of Travelling Allowance and Bonus as income. The High Court's recalculations were deemed within its jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187793