<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 217 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under Central Excise Notification No.6/2002-C.Ex, denying the appellant&#039;s duty benefit claim due to mis-declaration. The goods, CDRW, were classified as 8471.7090, not falling under the specified category for exemption. The decision emphasized accurate declaration for duty exemptions, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 217 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under Central Excise Notification No.6/2002-C.Ex, denying the appellant&#039;s duty benefit claim due to mis-declaration. The goods, CDRW, were classified as 8471.7090, not falling under the specified category for exemption. The decision emphasized accurate declaration for duty exemptions, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>