<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 213 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334195</link>
    <description>The court found the show cause notices issued by the second respondent invalid as they prejudged the issue and lacked compliance with natural justice principles. It emphasized the necessity of issuing notices with an open mind and providing detailed reasons for disagreements with objections. The petitioner&#039;s objections and clarifications were not satisfactorily acknowledged, leading the court to direct the Commercial Tax Officer to conduct further proceedings, including a personal hearing and providing a reply with recorded reasons within eight weeks, while prohibiting coercive action against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 213 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334195</link>
      <description>The court found the show cause notices issued by the second respondent invalid as they prejudged the issue and lacked compliance with natural justice principles. It emphasized the necessity of issuing notices with an open mind and providing detailed reasons for disagreements with objections. The petitioner&#039;s objections and clarifications were not satisfactorily acknowledged, leading the court to direct the Commercial Tax Officer to conduct further proceedings, including a personal hearing and providing a reply with recorded reasons within eight weeks, while prohibiting coercive action against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>