https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187785 Where a person's status as a foreigner is in dispute, section 9 of the Foreigners Act places the burden on that person to prove that he is not a foreigner. The reference to section 9 of the Citizenship Act was misplaced because it concerns termination of citizenship and did not govern the controversy. Section 8 of the Foreigners Act was also inapplicable, as the issue was not the nationality of a person already found not to be an Indian citizen. The status question involved disputed facts requiring evidence and was not fit for determination in writ proceedings under Article 226, so the High Court should not have quashed the deportation order. en-us Tue, 04 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:24:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187785 Where a person's status as a foreigner is in dispute, section 9 of the Foreigners Act places the burden on that person to prove that he is not a foreigner. The reference to section 9 of the Citizenship Act was misplaced because it concerns termination of citizenship and did not govern the controversy. Section 8 of the Foreigners Act was also inapplicable, as the issue was not the nationality of a person already found not to be an Indian citizen. The status question involved disputed facts requiring evidence and was not fit for determination in writ proceedings under Article 226, so the High Court should not have quashed the deportation order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187785