<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1230 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187783</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and directed the Tribunal to hear the appeals on merits and make a decision within six weeks. The Court emphasized the urgency due to serious prejudice faced by the petitioner, criticizing the Tribunal for not conclusively addressing the classification issue of imported goods. Both parties agreed not to seek adjournments, and no coercive steps were to be taken until the Tribunal&#039;s final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1230 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187783</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and directed the Tribunal to hear the appeals on merits and make a decision within six weeks. The Court emphasized the urgency due to serious prejudice faced by the petitioner, criticizing the Tribunal for not conclusively addressing the classification issue of imported goods. Both parties agreed not to seek adjournments, and no coercive steps were to be taken until the Tribunal&#039;s final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>