<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5607</link>
    <description>Extra shift allowance was held admissible for machinery added during the previous year for assessment year 1970-71 where the allowance claim was based on double and triple shifts worked by the concern. Applying its earlier decision in connected matters on the same issue, the Supreme Court answered the referred question in the assessee&#039;s favour and against the Revenue, holding that the assessee was entitled to the allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5607</link>
      <description>Extra shift allowance was held admissible for machinery added during the previous year for assessment year 1970-71 where the allowance claim was based on double and triple shifts worked by the concern. Applying its earlier decision in connected matters on the same issue, the Supreme Court answered the referred question in the assessee&#039;s favour and against the Revenue, holding that the assessee was entitled to the allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>