<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 588 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187782</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 21 were invalid as they were initiated after the expiry of the specific limitation period provided under sub-section (4) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The court quashed the notice and order issued by the Trade Tax Officer, deeming them without jurisdiction. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, and the reassessment proceedings were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:13:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 588 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187782</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 21 were invalid as they were initiated after the expiry of the specific limitation period provided under sub-section (4) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The court quashed the notice and order issued by the Trade Tax Officer, deeming them without jurisdiction. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, and the reassessment proceedings were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>