https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187780 The Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sec. 47 (1-H) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, stating it does not violate Art. 14 or Art. 19 (1) (g). It clarified that renewal applications under Sec. 58 must be treated as new applications. The Court also upheld the application of Rule 155-A of the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules, affirming the validity of assigning marks to State Transport Undertakings. All petitions were dismissed, and the petitioners' contentions were found unsubstantiated. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2016 12:02:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187780 The Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sec. 47 (1-H) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, stating it does not violate Art. 14 or Art. 19 (1) (g). It clarified that renewal applications under Sec. 58 must be treated as new applications. The Court also upheld the application of Rule 155-A of the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules, affirming the validity of assigning marks to State Transport Undertakings. All petitions were dismissed, and the petitioners' contentions were found unsubstantiated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187780