<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1063 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187778</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court criticized the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana for passing standard orders without proper reasoning and directed the matter to be remanded for fresh disposal in accordance with the law. Status quo was ordered to be maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1063 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187778</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court criticized the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana for passing standard orders without proper reasoning and directed the matter to be remanded for fresh disposal in accordance with the law. Status quo was ordered to be maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>