https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187777 The Supreme Court held that the respondent, a retired Station Master, was not entitled to gratuity benefits under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as his case fell under the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993. The Court clarified the exclusion of railway employees from the 1972 Act, emphasizing the application of the 1993 Rules for gratuity calculation. The decision in Pritam Singh's case was deemed non-binding, and the Fifth Pay Commission's recommendations were found inapplicable to the respondent's retirement date. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187777 The Supreme Court held that the respondent, a retired Station Master, was not entitled to gratuity benefits under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as his case fell under the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993. The Court clarified the exclusion of railway employees from the 1972 Act, emphasizing the application of the 1993 Rules for gratuity calculation. The decision in Pritam Singh's case was deemed non-binding, and the Fifth Pay Commission's recommendations were found inapplicable to the respondent's retirement date. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187777