<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187773</link>
    <description>A municipal project executed through a developer was treated as within the local authority&#039;s statutory powers, because a permissible project does not become unlawful merely due to the chosen mode of financing and implementation. The Court read the municipal powers broadly enough to accommodate the arrangement, found no violation of the relevant statutory limits, and held the resolution not ultra vires. Judicial review was also confined, as policy, economic, and administrative choices are interfered with only on illegality, constitutional or legal breach, abuse of power, or a clear public law defect. No arbitrariness or improper tailoring of the tender process was established, so the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187773</link>
      <description>A municipal project executed through a developer was treated as within the local authority&#039;s statutory powers, because a permissible project does not become unlawful merely due to the chosen mode of financing and implementation. The Court read the municipal powers broadly enough to accommodate the arrangement, found no violation of the relevant statutory limits, and held the resolution not ultra vires. Judicial review was also confined, as policy, economic, and administrative choices are interfered with only on illegality, constitutional or legal breach, abuse of power, or a clear public law defect. No arbitrariness or improper tailoring of the tender process was established, so the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>