<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1229 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187766</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the revisional authority to decide the pending revision petition within three months after hearing the petitioner. Coercive steps under the impugned orders were kept in abeyance until that decision, preserving interim protection while the revision remained pending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:07:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1229 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187766</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the revisional authority to decide the pending revision petition within three months after hearing the petitioner. Coercive steps under the impugned orders were kept in abeyance until that decision, preserving interim protection while the revision remained pending.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>