<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1228 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187765</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that 50% of the payment for Value Added Services (VAS) constituted royalty/fees for technical services, while the remaining 50% was classified as business receipts. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the taxability of the payment under the Double Taxation Agreement based on the nature of services provided by DTC and the absence of a Permanent Establishment in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 14:59:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1228 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187765</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that 50% of the payment for Value Added Services (VAS) constituted royalty/fees for technical services, while the remaining 50% was classified as business receipts. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the taxability of the payment under the Double Taxation Agreement based on the nature of services provided by DTC and the absence of a Permanent Establishment in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>