<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 347 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187763</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the termination order due to the violation of natural justice principles. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness in employment termination cases, directing the reinstatement of the appellant with back wages and benefits. This decision underscores the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and ensuring employee protection in termination processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 12:30:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 347 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187763</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the termination order due to the violation of natural justice principles. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness in employment termination cases, directing the reinstatement of the appellant with back wages and benefits. This decision underscores the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and ensuring employee protection in termination processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>