https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187759 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of complying with the amended Rule 15 under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Despite the absence of the required Form JJ, the petitioner's submission of the invoice and lorry receipt should have sufficed. The court set aside the detention order, directing the respondent to release the goods and vehicle immediately upon production of the court's order, without imposing any costs. This decision ensures a fair resolution regarding the detention of goods due to defective documents and highlights the significance of proper interpretation of rules and circulars in such cases. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2016 11:04:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187759 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of complying with the amended Rule 15 under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Despite the absence of the required Form JJ, the petitioner's submission of the invoice and lorry receipt should have sufficed. The court set aside the detention order, directing the respondent to release the goods and vehicle immediately upon production of the court's order, without imposing any costs. This decision ensures a fair resolution regarding the detention of goods due to defective documents and highlights the significance of proper interpretation of rules and circulars in such cases. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187759