<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 206 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334188</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, concluding that the notional interest on advances given to partners and sister concerns was not warranted as no interest-bearing funds were diverted. Additionally, the advances written off were considered deductible under section 37 as business expenses, not capital in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 206 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334188</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, concluding that the notional interest on advances given to partners and sister concerns was not warranted as no interest-bearing funds were diverted. Additionally, the advances written off were considered deductible under section 37 as business expenses, not capital in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>