<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 199 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order and granting relief to the appellant. The appellant was found not liable for service tax on activities related to erection and commissioning of transmission lines and poles for electricity distribution for the period April 2005 to March 2010. The Tribunal applied Notification No. 45/2010-ST dated 20.07.2010, exempting the appellant from tax liability due to the undisputed relevance of the activities to electricity transmission and distribution. However, concerns were raised about the appellant collecting service tax without proper records, leading to a limited remand for verification and potential recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 06:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 199 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order and granting relief to the appellant. The appellant was found not liable for service tax on activities related to erection and commissioning of transmission lines and poles for electricity distribution for the period April 2005 to March 2010. The Tribunal applied Notification No. 45/2010-ST dated 20.07.2010, exempting the appellant from tax liability due to the undisputed relevance of the activities to electricity transmission and distribution. However, concerns were raised about the appellant collecting service tax without proper records, leading to a limited remand for verification and potential recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>