<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 193 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334175</link>
    <description>Chartered, contract and casual bus services were not taxable as &#039;tour operator&#039; service for the period before 10-09-2004 because the vehicles were stage carriage buses on temporary or special permits and were not shown to satisfy the statutory requirements of a tourist vehicle or contract carriage. For the period from 10-09-2004, the expanded definition still did not apply because the assessees only supplied buses under contractual arrangements and did not plan, schedule, organize or arrange tours. The service tax demands were therefore unsustainable, and the department&#039;s challenge to the dropped demand also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 193 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334175</link>
      <description>Chartered, contract and casual bus services were not taxable as &#039;tour operator&#039; service for the period before 10-09-2004 because the vehicles were stage carriage buses on temporary or special permits and were not shown to satisfy the statutory requirements of a tourist vehicle or contract carriage. For the period from 10-09-2004, the expanded definition still did not apply because the assessees only supplied buses under contractual arrangements and did not plan, schedule, organize or arrange tours. The service tax demands were therefore unsustainable, and the department&#039;s challenge to the dropped demand also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>