<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 192 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the denial of Exemption Notification No.32/2004-ST to the appellant, ruling that the circular&#039;s additional requirements regarding declaration on consignment notes were not mandated by the Notification. The appellant&#039;s compliance with a general declaration from the transport agency was deemed sufficient, and the department failed to prove non-compliance with cenvat credit and Notification 12/2003-ST conditions. The Tribunal emphasized that procedural requirements should not override explicit Notification conditions and cited precedents supporting its decision, ultimately granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 192 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the denial of Exemption Notification No.32/2004-ST to the appellant, ruling that the circular&#039;s additional requirements regarding declaration on consignment notes were not mandated by the Notification. The appellant&#039;s compliance with a general declaration from the transport agency was deemed sufficient, and the department failed to prove non-compliance with cenvat credit and Notification 12/2003-ST conditions. The Tribunal emphasized that procedural requirements should not override explicit Notification conditions and cited precedents supporting its decision, ultimately granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>