<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5598</link>
    <description>Income from flats is chargeable under the head &quot;Income from house property&quot; where the person in possession under an agreement for sale has paid consideration and is entitled in his own right to enjoy the property and receive its income; formal registered title is not essential for section 22. The contrary view requiring registered conveyance was rejected. The Finance Act, 1987 amendment to section 27 enlarging the deemed ownership category was treated as declaratory and clarificatory, not a substantive change, and therefore applies retrospectively. The interpretation of &quot;owner&quot; in the house property provisions was thus confirmed to include beneficial entitlement to income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5598</link>
      <description>Income from flats is chargeable under the head &quot;Income from house property&quot; where the person in possession under an agreement for sale has paid consideration and is entitled in his own right to enjoy the property and receive its income; formal registered title is not essential for section 22. The contrary view requiring registered conveyance was rejected. The Finance Act, 1987 amendment to section 27 enlarging the deemed ownership category was treated as declaratory and clarificatory, not a substantive change, and therefore applies retrospectively. The interpretation of &quot;owner&quot; in the house property provisions was thus confirmed to include beneficial entitlement to income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>