<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 190 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334172</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, with the denial of credit on staff welfare and printing services upheld. However, credit on other input services, including outward transportation of final products, courier, car rental, air travel, maintenance, pest control, etc., was granted. The decision was based on legal precedents and interpretations of the CENVAT Credit Rules, emphasizing the broad scope of the definition of input services under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 06:39:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 190 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334172</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, with the denial of credit on staff welfare and printing services upheld. However, credit on other input services, including outward transportation of final products, courier, car rental, air travel, maintenance, pest control, etc., was granted. The decision was based on legal precedents and interpretations of the CENVAT Credit Rules, emphasizing the broad scope of the definition of input services under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>