https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334168 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration. The Tribunal found the evidence presented by the appellant regarding the fire incident and loss suffered compelling, indicating a lack of communication from the department post-fire. Emphasizing the need for a thorough review, the Tribunal refrained from making a definitive decision on remission eligibility, granting the appellant a fair hearing opportunity and directing the Commissioner to reevaluate the claim based on available evidence. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2017 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334168 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration. The Tribunal found the evidence presented by the appellant regarding the fire incident and loss suffered compelling, indicating a lack of communication from the department post-fire. Emphasizing the need for a thorough review, the Tribunal refrained from making a definitive decision on remission eligibility, granting the appellant a fair hearing opportunity and directing the Commissioner to reevaluate the claim based on available evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334168