<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 9 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5597</link>
    <description>In penalty proceedings for concealment or misstatement under section 271(1)(c), the governing law is the law in force when the return containing the concealment or misstatement was filed, not the law in force when penalty proceedings were initiated. The Court treated the delinquency as linked to the return itself, including an original or revised return, so the penalty had to be computed by reference to the law applicable on that filing date. The issue was resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 9 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5597</link>
      <description>In penalty proceedings for concealment or misstatement under section 271(1)(c), the governing law is the law in force when the return containing the concealment or misstatement was filed, not the law in force when penalty proceedings were initiated. The Court treated the delinquency as linked to the return itself, including an original or revised return, so the penalty had to be computed by reference to the law applicable on that filing date. The issue was resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>