https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334151 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a trader registered under the Value Added Tax Act, allowing them to operate their bank account freely. The provisional attachment of the bank account was deemed invalid as no fresh attachment orders were issued after a specific date. With interim and final orders by the VAT Tribunal fulfilling the predeposit condition, the department could not recover further tax dues. The court concluded that the petitioner should be able to operate the bank account without restrictions, as the attachment order had expired with time and no outstanding dues existed. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2016 06:37:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334151 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a trader registered under the Value Added Tax Act, allowing them to operate their bank account freely. The provisional attachment of the bank account was deemed invalid as no fresh attachment orders were issued after a specific date. With interim and final orders by the VAT Tribunal fulfilling the predeposit condition, the department could not recover further tax dues. The court concluded that the petitioner should be able to operate the bank account without restrictions, as the attachment order had expired with time and no outstanding dues existed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334151