<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 652 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187756</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed as the appellants failed to comply with the pre-deposit order under Section 129E of the Customs Act. Despite claims of partial payment, discrepancies were noted, and the appellants&#039; failure to fulfill the pre-deposit requirement led to the dismissal of all appeals. Requests for holding the matter in abeyance pending a writ appeal were denied due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit directive and the dismissal of the writ petition by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 18:10:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 652 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187756</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed as the appellants failed to comply with the pre-deposit order under Section 129E of the Customs Act. Despite claims of partial payment, discrepancies were noted, and the appellants&#039; failure to fulfill the pre-deposit requirement led to the dismissal of all appeals. Requests for holding the matter in abeyance pending a writ appeal were denied due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit directive and the dismissal of the writ petition by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>