https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187754 The SC set aside the Division Bench's judgment and restored the Single Judge's order, recognizing the contractor's entitlement to compensation for delays caused by the respondent. The SC acknowledged that the "No Claim Certificate" was issued under duress, as the respondent withheld payments. The court emphasized limited judicial interference in arbitration awards, supporting the arbitrator's decision. The contractor was awarded costs of Rs. 10,000, and the appeals were allowed. en-us Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187754 The SC set aside the Division Bench's judgment and restored the Single Judge's order, recognizing the contractor's entitlement to compensation for delays caused by the respondent. The SC acknowledged that the "No Claim Certificate" was issued under duress, as the respondent withheld payments. The court emphasized limited judicial interference in arbitration awards, supporting the arbitrator's decision. The contractor was awarded costs of Rs. 10,000, and the appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187754