https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187748 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the National Consumer Commission's orders and remitting the matter for fresh disposal according to law. The Court clarified that its observations were reasons for the order and not findings on the parties' claims. The dispute involved insurable interest in a vessel, liability of the insurance company, rights of a mortgagee in an insurance claim, jurisdiction of the Commission, and interpretation of legal provisions under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court affirmed the Commission's jurisdiction to adjudicate conflicting claims and emphasized its power to decide disputes involving multiple parties seeking the same relief. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:44:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187748 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the National Consumer Commission's orders and remitting the matter for fresh disposal according to law. The Court clarified that its observations were reasons for the order and not findings on the parties' claims. The dispute involved insurable interest in a vessel, liability of the insurance company, rights of a mortgagee in an insurance claim, jurisdiction of the Commission, and interpretation of legal provisions under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court affirmed the Commission's jurisdiction to adjudicate conflicting claims and emphasized its power to decide disputes involving multiple parties seeking the same relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187748