<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5591</link>
    <description>SC held that a discount on debentures constitutes expenditure incurred in the course of business and must be spread over the life of the debentures. The liability to pay the discounted amount, though incurred on issue, secures a continuing benefit and is properly written off proportionately over the relevant period. The taxpayer was therefore entitled to deduct only the apportioned part of the discount for the assessment year; the remaining balance could not be deducted in that year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5591</link>
      <description>SC held that a discount on debentures constitutes expenditure incurred in the course of business and must be spread over the life of the debentures. The liability to pay the discounted amount, though incurred on issue, secures a continuing benefit and is properly written off proportionately over the relevant period. The taxpayer was therefore entitled to deduct only the apportioned part of the discount for the assessment year; the remaining balance could not be deducted in that year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>