<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 1005 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187744</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal before the High Court was accepted to be sufficiently explained in the circumstances, so condonation was warranted. The appeal was restored to the High Court for disposal on merits, and costs were imposed on the appellants in favour of the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:58:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 1005 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187744</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal before the High Court was accepted to be sufficiently explained in the circumstances, so condonation was warranted. The appeal was restored to the High Court for disposal on merits, and costs were imposed on the appellants in favour of the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>