<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on capital gains loss and exemption u/s 54F. It emphasized the need for thorough verification of claims before allowing them, remanding the matters to the AO for proper consideration. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of factual correctness over legal soundness in decisions, ensuring fair treatment for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on capital gains loss and exemption u/s 54F. It emphasized the need for thorough verification of claims before allowing them, remanding the matters to the AO for proper consideration. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of factual correctness over legal soundness in decisions, ensuring fair treatment for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>