https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334136 Where no confiscation or attachment had been issued against an assessee's plant and machinery, and no subsisting title dispute was pending, the assets could not be withheld merely because they were lying in another company's . The order of confiscation was found to relate to the other company's assets, not the appellant's property, and the Revenue accepted that no formal attachment covered the appellant's assets. On that basis, the appellant was entitled to immediate release and removal of its assets, and the respondent was directed to restore possession forthwith. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334136 Where no confiscation or attachment had been issued against an assessee's plant and machinery, and no subsisting title dispute was pending, the assets could not be withheld merely because they were lying in another company's . The order of confiscation was found to relate to the other company's assets, not the appellant's property, and the Revenue accepted that no formal attachment covered the appellant's assets. On that basis, the appellant was entitled to immediate release and removal of its assets, and the respondent was directed to restore possession forthwith. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334136