<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 122 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334104</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding fresh claims on capital loss and exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that since the facts supporting the fresh claim were already on record, the Appellate Authority was entitled to consider the new claim. It was concluded that no substantial question of law arose as the issue had been settled by a previous decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 122 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334104</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding fresh claims on capital loss and exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that since the facts supporting the fresh claim were already on record, the Appellate Authority was entitled to consider the new claim. It was concluded that no substantial question of law arose as the issue had been settled by a previous decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>