<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 635 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187722</link>
    <description>A civil dispute concerning central excise was presented to the Supreme Court; the record identifies the parties as Eastern Coils Private Ltd. v. Commissioner, Central Excise, with two judges presiding. The operative procedural outcome recorded is that the civil appeal was dismissed. No substantive legal reasoning or statutory interpretation is provided in the text; only the docket citation, bench composition, and final disposition are recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 635 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187722</link>
      <description>A civil dispute concerning central excise was presented to the Supreme Court; the record identifies the parties as Eastern Coils Private Ltd. v. Commissioner, Central Excise, with two judges presiding. The operative procedural outcome recorded is that the civil appeal was dismissed. No substantive legal reasoning or statutory interpretation is provided in the text; only the docket citation, bench composition, and final disposition are recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>