<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 779 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187719</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice and the need for a pragmatic approach in condoning delays in legal proceedings. The delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) was condoned, and the case was remanded back to CIT(A) for reconsideration on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:10:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 779 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187719</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice and the need for a pragmatic approach in condoning delays in legal proceedings. The delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) was condoned, and the case was remanded back to CIT(A) for reconsideration on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>