<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1296 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that prior to 13/07/2006, refunds on finalization of provisional assessments under Section 18 of the Customs Act were not subject to unjust enrichment. The appellant&#039;s refund claim was allowed without the need for a claim submission, as the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply during that period. The appeal was granted, and the appellant was entitled to the refund without the application of unjust enrichment provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:13:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1296 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that prior to 13/07/2006, refunds on finalization of provisional assessments under Section 18 of the Customs Act were not subject to unjust enrichment. The appellant&#039;s refund claim was allowed without the need for a claim submission, as the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply during that period. The appeal was granted, and the appellant was entitled to the refund without the application of unjust enrichment provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>